Here are the original Comptroller letter giving HLECC tax exempt status, the C.J. Gerlach affidavit, and the McClendon verifying deed restrictions for all present and future subdivision sections, lots, and properties (except sec.1, blk 1, lot 1).





Here are the original Comptroller letter giving HLECC tax exempt status, the C.J. Gerlach affidavit, and the McClendon verifying deed restrictions for all present and future subdivision sections, lots, and properties (except sec.1, blk 1, lot 1).
So in essence, all of the subdivision with the exception of lot 1, block 1, would be subject to the same restrictions, right?
That is correct. When I reviewed the document for someone who asked, I saw that right away. Just recently got the Ernie McClendon letter from someone recently to back up what I was saying. Glad these old documents are still around.
Sharon, here is the interesting thing about the Block 1, Lot 1 exception. I have been saying all along that the Pool should be set up as a commercial endeavor, so that it could be self paying, like the store. The store and the pool share the same lot. The store is the west half of Lot 1 and the pool is the east half of Lot 1. In Polk CAD records, they are both designated as Commercial properties. So, maybe that could be a solution for the pool issues.